Are there any options regarding depth of field? #4676
-
|
Title pretty much says it all. Are there any depth of field options that I'm not aware about? Has anyone had encounters with this before? Any suggestions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
No, depth of field is pretty tricky to do well outside of a ray-tracer. The rasterizer approaches I've seen have all had pretty glaring artifacts. If you want the whole 3D model sharp and the background blurred, that's doable with a low-res or blurred skybox-image. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Taught I would get a response like this but still had to double check :) thank you for the reply and suggestion |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
No, depth of field is pretty tricky to do well outside of a ray-tracer. The rasterizer approaches I've seen have all had pretty glaring artifacts. If you want the whole 3D model sharp and the background blurred, that's doable with a low-res or blurred skybox-image.