28.1.1
#1279
Replies: 1 comment
-
-> #1352. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Even though I see it's straight out of the documentation, I think this could be made clearer.
The code is a bit odd because the first
result
is nothing (()
).This seems clearer to me:
(Alternatively, could do an assertion on the unwrapped value of result, but printing it seems clearer to me.)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions