Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
You can already do node.hidden_signal.connect(new_signal.emit) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'd like to have a way to propagate a signal without needing to write a handler for it. Sometimes, you just need a node to reinterpret a signal as one of their own signals, and that's it. I believe this would lead to performance improvements (albeit quite low) and reduce code clutter, also making it extremely easy to propagate them. I'd give another method instead of connect, being reemit, or something, and thus when receiving the signal reemiting it exactly the same under some other name.
node.signal.reemit(node2.signal)
could be a good way to do it, and also to give the option to do it from the editor.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions