C++: respond to PR comments

Author: rdmarsh2

cpp/ql/lib/experimental/semmle/code/cpp/dataflow/ProductFlow.qll

@@ -52,10 +52,6 @@ module ProductFlow {
     override predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
       exists(Configuration conf | conf.isSinkPair(_, sink))
     }
-
-    override int explorationLimit() {
-        result = 10
-    }
   }
 
   predicate reachablePair1(
@@ -67,7 +63,7 @@ module ProductFlow {
     exists(DataFlow::PathNode mid1 |
       reachablePair1(conf, source1, source2, mid1, node2) and
       mid1.getASuccessor() = node1 and
-      mid1.getNode().getFunction() = node1.getNode().getFunction()
+      mid1.getNode().getEnclosingCallable() = node1.getNode().getEnclosingCallable()
     )
   }
 
@@ -80,7 +76,7 @@ module ProductFlow {
     exists(DataFlow2::PathNode mid2 |
       reachablePair2(conf, source1, source2, node1, mid2) and
       mid2.getASuccessor() = node2 and
-      mid2.getNode().getFunction() = node2.getNode().getFunction()
+      mid2.getNode().getEnclosingCallable() = node2.getNode().getEnclosingCallable()
     )
   }
 
@@ -92,10 +88,10 @@ module ProductFlow {
       reachablePair2(conf, source1, source2, mid1, mid2) and
       mid1.getASuccessor() = node1 and
       mid2.getASuccessor() = node2 and
-      mid1.getNode().getFunction() = funcMid and // TODO: recursive function weirdness?
-      mid2.getNode().getFunction() = funcMid and
-      node1.getNode().getFunction() = func and
-      node2.getNode().getFunction() = func and
+      mid1.getNode().getEnclosingCallable() = funcMid and // TODO: recursive function weirdness?
+      mid2.getNode().getEnclosingCallable() = funcMid and
+      node1.getNode().getEnclosingCallable() = func and
+      node2.getNode().getEnclosingCallable() = func and
       funcMid != func
     )
   }

cpp/ql/src/experimental/Likely Bugs/OverrunWriteProductFlow.ql

@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ class StringSizeConfiguration extends ProductFlow::Configuration {
 
   override predicate isSourcePair(DataFlow::Node bufSource, DataFlow::Node sizeSource) {
     exists(
-      GVN sizeGVN // TODO: use-use flow instead of GVN
+      GVN sizeGvn // TODO: use-use flow instead of GVN
     |
-      bufSource.asConvertedExpr().(AllocationExpr).getSizeExpr() = sizeGVN.getAnExpr() and
-      sizeSource.asConvertedExpr() = sizeGVN.getAnExpr()
+      bufSource.asConvertedExpr().(AllocationExpr).getSizeExpr() = sizeGvn.getAnExpr() and
+      sizeSource.asConvertedExpr() = sizeGvn.getAnExpr()
     )
   }
 
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ class StringSizeConfiguration extends ProductFlow::Configuration {
   }
 }
 
-from StringSizeConfiguration conf, DataFlow::PathNode source1, DataFlow2::PathNode source2, DataFlow::PathNode sink1, DataFlow2::PathNode sink2
+// we don't actually check correctness yet. Right now the query just finds relevant source/sink pairs.
+from
+  StringSizeConfiguration conf, DataFlow::PathNode source1, DataFlow2::PathNode source2,
+  DataFlow::PathNode sink1, DataFlow2::PathNode sink2
 where conf.hasFlowPath(source1, source2, sink1, sink2)
 select source1, source2, sink1, sink2