Making 3D velocity models #548
Ali1990dashti
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
|
I don't fully get it. You have a 2D profile of sensors, but you do a 3D synthetic model computation (why?). Finally you invert the data 2D as this is the default if you don't specify a mesh. By default, the mesh depth is derived from the shot-geophone distance and 22m is probably deep enough. I don't think that rays with such limited offsets and small contrasts will reach the third layer, but you can check when looking at the first-arrival traveltime curves slope. But anyway you can set the model depth by |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear community,
First and foremost, thanks for making open-source codes and for your support.
I recently started my work with pyGIMLi and want to make a simple 3D Refraction modeling and inversion with it. The 2D example is presented here. I am using pyGIMLi
1.4.0.This is my code:
And the following graph comes with this line of code:
But as you can see the data only covers depths to -22 m:
To be honest I am not sure which mistakes I have done. Therefore, I am looking for hints from people who are using pyGIMLi.
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions