Metal performance when using llama-cpp-python wrapper tanked from 0.2.28 to 0.2.29 (I know this is a llama.cpp core discussion.. but..) #6113
Unanswered
agnosticlines
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 6 replies
-
Can you confirm that the GPU is used by observing the activity monitor? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey all,
I know this is a llama.cpp core project and this issue is about the python wrapper not by the same developers but I've been looking into this issue for a few days and it's kind of stumped me, I don't suppose anyone here with their knowledge of the llama.cpp codebase could think of why performance would tank on metal from version 6efb8eb to 4483396 of llama.cpp?
There's an issue here too, I've also done a little bit of digging here I'm just a bit stumped and would love some smart people to help :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions