Skip to content

Metal performance when using llama-cpp-python wrapper tanked from 0.2.28 to 0.2.29 (I know this is a llama.cpp core discussion.. but..) #6113

Unanswered
agnosticlines asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 1 comment 6 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
6 replies
@ggerganov
Comment options

@agnosticlines
Comment options

@agnosticlines
Comment options

@ggerganov
Comment options

@agnosticlines
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants