Should this be llm.cpp not llama.cpp? #3844
lin-calvin
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I think this was discussed long ago, and the conclusion pretty much was, that it's too late to rebrand. :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
though it is aim at running llama at the begin but it is able to run various non-llama models. so should it be renamed to llm.cpp to show that it can not only run llama?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions