You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Question: Can the standard 'split' command be used instead of 'gguf-split' for splitting GGUF model files?
I'm wondering if there's any difference between using the regular Unix/Linux 'split' command versus the specialized 'gguf-split' tool when splitting large GGUF model files. Are there any advantages or potential issues to be aware of when choosing between these methods?
My concern is that 'split' might cut through the middle of tensors or quant structures, potentially making it more difficult to correctly reassemble the model. Does 'gguf-split' handle these model-specific structures more intelligently?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Question: Can the standard 'split' command be used instead of 'gguf-split' for splitting GGUF model files?
I'm wondering if there's any difference between using the regular Unix/Linux 'split' command versus the specialized 'gguf-split' tool when splitting large GGUF model files. Are there any advantages or potential issues to be aware of when choosing between these methods?
My concern is that 'split' might cut through the middle of tensors or quant structures, potentially making it more difficult to correctly reassemble the model. Does 'gguf-split' handle these model-specific structures more intelligently?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions