File tree Expand file tree Collapse file tree 1 file changed +3
-3
lines changed
src/docs/product/issues/issue-details/performance-issues/consecutive-db-queries Expand file tree Collapse file tree 1 file changed +3
-3
lines changed Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ The detector for this performance issue looks for a set of sequential, non-overl
21
21
22
22
Once these spans are found, the following must also hold true:
23
23
24
- - Maximum time saved from parallelization must exceed a threshold
25
- - The ratio between the maximum time saved and the duration of the sequential spans must exceed a threshold
26
- - Total duration of each parallelizable span must exceed a threshold
24
+ - Maximum time saved from parallelization must exceed a 100ms threshold
25
+ - Ratio between the maximum time saved and the duration of the sequential spans must exceed a 0.1 threshold
26
+ - Total duration of each parallelizable span must exceed a 30ms threshold
27
27
28
28
If Sentry isn't detecting a Consecutive DB issue where you expect one, it's probably because the transaction didn't meet one of the above criteria.
29
29
You can’t perform that action at this time.
0 commit comments