Skip to content

Commit 8b355b9

Browse files
authored
feat(perf-issues): Add consec db thresholds to docs (#6282)
1 parent 7daca2a commit 8b355b9

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed
  • src/docs/product/issues/issue-details/performance-issues/consecutive-db-queries

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

src/docs/product/issues/issue-details/performance-issues/consecutive-db-queries/index.mdx

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ The detector for this performance issue looks for a set of sequential, non-overl
2121

2222
Once these spans are found, the following must also hold true:
2323

24-
- Maximum time saved from parallelization must exceed a threshold
25-
- The ratio between the maximum time saved and the duration of the sequential spans must exceed a threshold
26-
- Total duration of each parallelizable span must exceed a threshold
24+
- Maximum time saved from parallelization must exceed a 100ms threshold
25+
- Ratio between the maximum time saved and the duration of the sequential spans must exceed a 0.1 threshold
26+
- Total duration of each parallelizable span must exceed a 30ms threshold
2727

2828
If Sentry isn't detecting a Consecutive DB issue where you expect one, it's probably because the transaction didn't meet one of the above criteria.
2929

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)