Skip to content

added hoverForMore functionality #5631

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Eyt-Lev
Copy link

@Eyt-Lev Eyt-Lev commented Aug 4, 2025

Proposed change

Added hoverForMore option for calendar so disabling it will free you of the need to hover in order to see additional information.
The feature is off by default, making sure to not be changing existing behavior.

Demo: hoverForMore is set to false:
image

Type of change

  • New service widget
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature or enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Documentation only
  • Other (please explain)

Checklist:

  • If applicable, I have added corresponding documentation changes.
  • If applicable, I have reviewed the feature / enhancement and / or service widget guidelines.
  • I have checked that all code style checks pass using pre-commit hooks and linting checks.
  • If applicable, I have tested my code for new features & regressions on both mobile & desktop devices, using the latest version of major browsers.

PS. this is not closing any issue, as it was just a quick fix for me. if needed I can create a feature request.

@Eyt-Lev
Copy link
Author

Eyt-Lev commented Aug 4, 2025

ah looks like linting isn't passing (the check didn't work for me), I will try to fix that

@shamoon
Copy link
Collaborator

shamoon commented Aug 4, 2025

Thanks very much. Please review the feature guidelines. We’re happy to re-address in the future.

@shamoon shamoon closed this Aug 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants