Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Since structures are incompatible if even one attribute is added, adding one attribute would be no different than allowing users to use their own |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
How about using mdc ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I want to check if this is acceptable before attempting a PR or if there is existing work. Could be related to structured logging, but I think what I need is simpler.
Proposal
It would be great if I could attach custom user data to
spdlog::details::log_msg
via a simplevoid*
pointer. From there I can add a regularspdlog::custom_flag_formatter
to use the pointer data however I need.In my case I want a way to add arbitrary prefixes at the start of the log line. spdlog supports custom log level names but I need more prefixes than
spdlog::level::n_levels
and I need the semantics separated from the logging levels.This could be optional behind
#ifdef SPDLOG_LOG_MSG_USERDATA
.Alternative
I've already implemented an alternative where I encode the info I need in the
log_msg::payload
and then decode it in a custom flag formatter. Two main downsides to this approach:const_cast
in the flag formatter to "trim" the encoded info out of the payload. Works now but could violate spdlog preconditions in the future.I'm not happy with this alternative as a production solution.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions