/back Command Behaviour

[itzrobotix]

Hello again, I didn't want to create an issue for this before I had asked the question.

I'm running latest Fuji version as of 3 hours ago today and it still seems on my server. When a player teleports via methods not handled by Fuji (Vanilla /tp) that it won't save that location for /back. It is only storing from /tpa etc and deaths. Is this normal behaviour?

Thanks for your time.

[sakurawald]

There are many teleport functions inside internal Minecraft.
The /back only intercepts the absolute teleport function, and ignores relative teleport function.

Like the /tp ~ ~100 ~ will be ignore.

Besides, the ignore_distance specifies the distance that should be ignored between 2 teleports in the same dimension. (Like, if you just teleport to the same dimension, but the distance is close enough)

Actually, the /back didn't care who starts the teleport, which command or which mod. It only intercepts the teleport function inside the Minecraft internal.

[sakurawald]

Yeah, there are 2 teleport functions in the internal.
The one used by /tp command is not listened by /back command.
e.g. The /tp 0 64 0 command.

[itzrobotix]

Ah yes, that is the functionality I had noticed so that makes sense. Yeah I've removed the ignore_distance personally as I'd like all teleports to register but whilst working on the server. The base /tp command is used a lot from staff but isn't being registered in the /back. Which isn't the biggest issue but it's a noticeable inconvenience if that makes sense. Is there anyway the relative teleport functions could be implemented as well, either as standard or as an option? Or is that outside of the scope for this functionality?

[sakurawald]

I'd like all teleports to register

It can be a feature for /back module. I have a plan to re-write a better implementation before.
I think I can provide an option to allow register on all internal teleport functions.

[itzrobotix]

Also thank you for taking the time to provide an explanation

[sakurawald]

I turn this discussion into an issue. #399

[itzrobotix]

Thank you! I look forward to the implementation

[sakurawald]

It's done in #399