Skip to content

consider packaging WEBCAT functionality as a library #60

@redshiftzero

Description

@redshiftzero

One idea is to package a subset of WEBCAT's functionality as a library that could be integrated into other privacy and security sensitive related browser extensions e.g. extensions like Metamask. One advantage is adoption, WEBCAT can be widely adopted in existing browser extensions and the sites/frontends they interact with would be early testers and then after stabilization, users of WEBCAT.

This would be a significant effort since we'd need to design the right API, package it up (and refactor the existing browser extension to use said library), and ensure the enrollment infrastructure is solid. There's also the risk that if something is stabilized at the browser level that we can use for integrity/transparency, we may need to modify how things work on the WEBCAT side.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions