Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
If you are using an HRRPUA RAMP then the burning rate isn't coupled to the actual heat feedback. Getting negative temperatures implies your predicted flux is low compared to that needed to sustain the burning rate. One possible solution is to not use a heat of vaporization and instead define a temperature dependent specific heat. You could make that specific heat very large after reaching some notional post-ignition surface temperature. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear all,
I'm trying to model the spread of fire between wood cribs in a large compartment. Each crib is modeled as a solid obstacle with a surface material. The surfaces are assigned thermal and combustion properties such as ignition temperature, heat release rate per unit area (HRRPUA), and burning duration, which are defined using a time-based ramp function.
Some cribs are configured to ignite first, acting as the initial ignition sources, while neighboring cribs are designed to catch fire later through thermal heating from the burning ones.
The problem I'm facing is that, based on this approach, the temperature of the wood cribs keeps rising, resulting in very high temperatures. These in turn radiate into the environment, leading to extremely high temperatures throughout the entire domain.
I tried introducing a heat of vaporization to reduce the temperature, but this led to negative temperatures at the beginning of the simulation. I'm wondering if anyone has experienced a similar issue, or if you have any suggestions on how to tackle this problem.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best regards,
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions