Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Nothing is super obvious when your input file is hundreds of lines long. In a case like this, it is best to simplify the case as much as possible. Leave only the essential components and output. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello All,
I am modelling two enclosures connected by means of a damper. The damper has an area of 0.2m2. The loss in the damper is fixed as 0.55 in both directions. Roughtness is set as 0. Both enclosures are connected to the outside by means of ducts modelled with HVAC. In one of the ducts I have prescribed an extrac rate of 2m3/s. This extract rate is reached after at 10s.
Then, it is expected that the air from the outside enterns enclosure 1, goes trough the damper with a velocity of 4m/s (2m3/s / 0.2m2) and extracted in enclosure 2. I would expect a pressure drop through the damper of 5.28Pa (iP=(/rhokv*v)/2). However, at 20s I am observing a pressure diference between the rooms of 60Pa approx.
I think the difference of pressure between rooms should be approx. 5Pa. Is there any problem in my model or I am not seeing something super obvious?
I suspect that the problem relates with the pressure zones.
I attach the .fds file.
TestP.txt
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions