Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
An camera is more like a large collection of extremely narrow angle heat radiometers (not total heat flux as it doesn't measure convection). Each pixel is like its own heat flux gauge that only sees that pixel's worth of the overall camera view angle. If you were to greatly increase the number of radiation angles and set a correspondingly narrow VIEW_ANGLE for the radiometer you would get something representing a collection of pixels. You would have to work out what number of angles to set based on how the camera data was processed (I would asssume it required some fraction of its view to exceed a threshold and not just a single pixel). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I was wondering if there is a way of modelling a thermal camera in FDS. I came across a case where a thermal camera is used to detect a fire.
As the camera reads the infrared energy emitted from a fire source and converts that into apparent temperature I was thinking of using the a total heat flux device that would read activate when the specified flux is attained. However, I am not sure if this approach actually mimics the working of a thermal camera? The other question I have is how can I model the entire viewing angle of the camera?
Or would there be another way of modelling this? Maybe using particles?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions