PROPOSAL: change the use
command structure
#155
Replies: 4 comments
-
This would mean that there would be a tree of commands as a result, use->cluster provider->identity provider. We'd also want to functionality that maps cluster providers to allowed identity providers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If we went with this approach you wouldn't be able to set the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Without doing this we need to have the forked version of Cobra where we can dynamically inject flags. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If no So i think perhaps we stay with what we have? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Describe the solution you'd like:
Currently when you
use
you are required to specify the cluster provider as a positional argument and then the IdP protocol as a flag:Would it make more sense to also specify the identity plugin via a position argument so you end up with:
What does everyone think? Would this feel more natural?
/cc @rajarajanpsj @seankelly001 @saada
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions