Replies: 1 comment
-
There is no additional abstraction between TypeBox and Feathers so what is described in the issue should work. I usually try to avoid circular dependencies because they always cause more issues than they help solve and instead try to design a unidirectional data model. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Following the tip in #2993,
I'm blocked when I want to specify schemas with circular dependencies.
Example :
I have users, and workspaces.
Each
user
can have severalworkspace
, but oneworkspace
belongs to oneuser
.So I would like to specify my schemas like this :
I find an issue on typebox talking about this sinclairzx81/typebox#106
But I can't figure out to make this work in Feathers...
Do you have any idea ?
Actually, I'm faking the result, so it's a
workspace: Type.Optional(Type.Any())
.For two models, that could work, but for nested relations, this seems a nightmare :-)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions