Replies: 6 comments 16 replies
-
Here's what our robot overloads had to say. Strap in. Deep Dive into |
Option | Type | Default (if known/inferred) | Description | Impact on node_modules Processing | Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
libraries | string | ['@stylexjs/open-props'] | List of package names from node_modules that use StyleX and need compilation. | Crucially, adds these packages to Vite's optimizeDeps.exclude list, preventing pre-bundling and allowing the plugin's transform hook to process their source with @stylexjs/babel-plugin. | 13 |
importSources | `(string \ | { from: string, as: string })` | ['stylex', '@stylexjs/stylex'] | Specifies StyleX import identifiers for the Babel plugin. | Ensures StyleX calls within node_modules libraries (using potentially varied import aliases) are correctly identified and transformed by @stylexjs/babel-plugin. |
unstable_moduleResolution | object | { type: 'commonJS', rootDir: process.cwd() } (from nonzzz/vite-plugin-stylex, likely similar for HorusGoul if not overridden per library) | Configuration for StyleX's Babel plugin to resolve theme modules and other internal dependencies. | For node_modules, rootDir needs to be dynamically set by the plugin to the specific library's root path to ensure correct StyleX theming and asset resolution within that library. | 4 |
stylexVirtualModuleId (Conceptual name for virtual CSS) | string | e.g., virtual:stylex.css or handled via *.css?url / @stylex stylesheet; | The mechanism for injecting aggregated StyleX CSS. | Collects CSS generated from both app code and specified node_modules libraries into a single, manageable CSS asset. | 11 |
This comparison underscores that vite-plugin-stylex
encapsulates a significant amount of specialized logic needed to make StyleX work seamlessly with external libraries in a Vite environment.
5. Hard-to-Replicate Aspects of vite-plugin-stylex
Several aspects of vite-plugin-stylex
's functionality would be particularly challenging to replicate reliably in a manual setup:
- Orchestration of Vite's Build Pipeline for
node_modules
: The precise interaction withoptimizeDeps.exclude
and ensuring that transformations occur at the correct stage in Vite's plugin lifecycle for these non-pre-bundlednode_modules
is a delicate process. It requires a deep understanding of Vite's internal plugin ordering and dependency processing logic.11 Getting this timing wrong could lead to either untransformed code or errors. - Robust Dynamic Path Resolution for
@stylexjs/babel-plugin
: As previously emphasized, the capability to dynamically and accurately setunstable_moduleResolution.rootDir
for the StyleX Babel plugin, based on the origin of each file being processed (whether from the main application or one of several differentnode_modules
dependencies), is a sophisticated piece of logic. This involves resolving package boundaries and file paths correctly, which can be particularly complex in scenarios like monorepos or when using linked dependencies. The need for absolute file paths for StyleX's alias setup to support theming correctly further highlights the importance of precise path resolution, which the plugin automates.14 This dynamic contextualization of the Babel plugin is arguably the most difficult feature to replicate manually. - Seamless CSS Aggregation and Virtual Module Management: The process of collecting CSS outputs from numerous transformation operations (across the application and multiple libraries), ensuring correct ordering (especially if CSS layers are used via the
useCSSLayers
option), and managing this aggregated CSS through a virtual module that integrates with Vite's serving and HMR capabilities is non-trivial. Dedicated CSS injection plugins for Vite, likevite-plugin-lib-inject-css
, demonstrate that even this focused task requires careful handling of Vite's metadata and hooks such asrenderChunk
.19vite-plugin-stylex
must perform this CSS management in addition to the upstream Babel transformation. - Ensuring HMR Compatibility for Styles from External Libraries: Implementing Hot Module Replacement that works reliably for style changes originating within
node_modules
dependencies (which have been excluded fromoptimizeDeps
) is complex. It requires the plugin to monitor these files for changes, re-trigger their StyleX compilation, update the aggregated CSS content of the virtual module, and then correctly signal Vite to inject only the updated styles into the browser, all without losing application state. - Error Handling and Diagnostics: A well-constructed plugin can provide more informative error messages when StyleX compilation fails within a dependency. It can contextualize the error to the specific library and file, which would be much harder to achieve in a generic manual Babel setup that lacks this awareness of processing
node_modules
.
These elements represent significant engineering effort encapsulated within the plugin, abstracting away considerable complexity from the end-user.
6. Context, Alternatives, and Future Considerations
The vite-plugin-stylex
by HorusGoul exists within an evolving ecosystem for StyleX tooling.
- Status and Maintenance of
HorusGoul/vite-plugin-stylex
: The plugin's README indicates it is in "early development".13 Observations of its GitHub repository (last commit activity being several months ago as of late 2023/early 2024 and issue fix: missing variable name in API Doc #99 questioning its status with StyleX 0.10) raise concerns about its current maintenance level and long-term viability.13 - Related Plugins:
nonzzz/vite-plugin-stylex
: This earlier unofficial plugin is now marked as "No longer maintained Migrate to stylex-extend".21 Its options, such asoptimizedDeps
for handling external libraries andunstable_moduleResolution
4, show that similar architectural approaches were employed.@stylex-extend/vite
: Presented as the successor tononzzz/vite-plugin-stylex
22, this plugin also features anoptimizedDeps
option, indicating it tackles the same core problem of processing external StyleX files. It represents a more current alternative ifHorusGoul/vite-plugin-stylex
is indeed unmaintained.
- The Official StyleX PostCSS Plugin (
@stylexjs/postcss-plugin
): A significant development is the release of an official PostCSS plugin by the StyleX team. Their documentation states: "StyleX now ships with an all-new PostCSS plugin. This plugin allows you to use StyleX with any PostCSS-compatible toolchain... The PostCSS plugin is now our recommended approach for using StyleX in a Next.js or Vite project".5 This official recommendation signals a potential shift in integration strategy. Vite has robust built-in PostCSS support.23 Utilizing@stylexjs/postcss-plugin
could leverage Vite's native capabilities more directly, potentially simplifying the toolchain by reducing reliance on more deeply integrated, Vite-specific plugins that manipulate the build process at multiple levels. However, the specifics of how this PostCSS plugin, when used via Vite's PostCSS pipeline, would handle thenode_modules
processing (particularly theoptimizeDeps.exclude
requirement and the dynamicrootDir
for StyleX's Babel plugin which the PostCSS plugin would wrap) would need careful consideration. It's plausible that manual configuration ofoptimizeDeps.exclude
might still be necessary, as PostCSS plugins themselves don't typically alter Vite's dependency optimization behavior. The PostCSS plugin essentially moves the StyleX Babel transformation into the PostCSS processing stage. - Challenges with External Libraries in General: The difficulties in processing styles from external libraries are not unique to StyleX. For example, an issue reported for
vanilla-extract
(another CSS-in-JS library) described rendering errors when consuming components from an external library, with suggestions that the bundling of the UI library itself might be a factor.25 This indicates a broader pattern: build-time CSS-in-JS solutions often require careful coordination between how libraries are authored/bundled and how consuming applications are configured to process them.
7. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations
vite-plugin-stylex
(specifically the HorusGoul/vite-plugin-stylex
version) effectively addresses a critical challenge for developers wishing to use StyleX-based component libraries from node_modules
within a Vite application. Its core mechanism—leveraging Vite's optimizeDeps.exclude
to prevent pre-bundling of specified dependencies and then applying the @stylexjs/babel-plugin
via Vite's transform
hook with context-aware configurations (like dynamic rootDir
)—is a sound architectural approach. This significantly simplifies the developer experience compared to the daunting complexity of a manual setup.
The plugin successfully automates several hard-to-replicate aspects, most notably the dynamic configuration of the StyleX Babel plugin for individual node_modules
dependencies and the aggregation of CSS from disparate sources into a manageable output with HMR support.
Guidance for Developers:
- When using
HorusGoul/vite-plugin-stylex
or similar plugins, meticulous configuration of thelibraries
(or equivalentoptimizedDeps
) option is paramount to ensure all external StyleX dependencies are correctly processed. - The maintenance status of any third-party plugin is a crucial consideration. Given the questions around
HorusGoul/vite-plugin-stylex
's current activity 13, developers should evaluate alternatives like@stylex-extend/vite
22 or, more significantly, the official@stylexjs/postcss-plugin
.5 - For troubleshooting, developers should familiarize themselves with Vite's dependency optimization logging (e.g., using
vite --debug
) and utilize tools likevite-plugin-inspect
11 to understand the transformation pipeline and intermediate states of modules.
Strategic Recommendation:
The StyleX team's endorsement of their @stylexjs/postcss-plugin as the recommended approach for Vite integration is a strong signal.5 For new projects or those with the capacity to refactor their build setup, evaluating this official PostCSS plugin is advisable. This aligns with official guidance and may offer better long-term stability and compatibility. However, this approach might shift some of the complexity towards correctly configuring Vite's PostCSS pipeline to process node_modules (potentially still requiring manual optimizeDeps.exclude settings and ensuring the StyleX Babel plugin options are correctly passed through PostCSS).
If a higher level of abstraction is preferred and a plugin like vite-plugin-stylex
(or its actively maintained forks/successors like @stylex-extend/vite
) "just works" for a given project's needs and its maintenance status is deemed acceptable, it remains a valuable tool for its simplification of a complex integration task. The choice depends on the project's specific requirements, tolerance for managing build complexities, and preference for official versus community-driven solutions.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Let's iterate on this. I prepared a reproduction for this issue with my setup: https://github.com/sergiocarneiro/example-stylex-vite-packages |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I was using a @nmn The way the postcss installation is documented right now is broken for me (https://stylexjs.com/docs/learn/installation/#postcss). More specifically, I'm getting the error |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey guys, I might have found the ideal solution for a Vite template, thanks to a related discussion that took place at #1079. This approach can have all configuration in a single file, // @ts-expect-error – untyped module
import stylex from "@stylexjs/postcss-plugin";
import react from "@vitejs/plugin-react";
import { defineConfig } from "vite";
import tsconfigPaths from "vite-tsconfig-paths";
import autoprefixer from "autoprefixer";
const babelConfig = {
presets: ["@babel/preset-typescript"],
plugins: [
[
"@stylexjs/babel-plugin",
{
dev: process.env.NODE_ENV === "development",
test: process.env.NODE_ENV === "test",
runtimeInjection: false,
genConditionalClasses: true,
treeshakeCompensation: true,
unstable_moduleResolution: {
type: "commonJS",
},
},
],
],
};
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [
react({ babel: babelConfig }),
tsconfigPaths(),
],
css: {
postcss: {
plugins: [
stylex({
babelConfig,
include: ["./app/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}"],
useCSSLayers: true,
}),
autoprefixer(),
],
},
},
});
You can find a more complex example on the repo I shared earlier: And this is a repo that helped me fix my setup: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Based on @sergiocarneiro 's snippet, I made a full repo here for Vite + StyleX: https://github.com/hyperknot/bug_repro/tree/main/vite_stylex It works correctly, both in dev and build mode. What I cannot figure out so far is how to make it work in a pnpm workspace. I'll need some help for that. But I think for the basic case of simple Vite + StyleX, this should be it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have found an issue with current Vite setups, including the one I shared previously. The issue is when using StyleX styles from published dependencies (workspace dependencies work, as Vite treats them differently). So if you install a dependency that shares styles created with StyleX, and use them in your project, you'll get the runtime error I have created a minimal reproduction: https://github.com/sergiocarneiro/repro-stylex-vite-published-packages |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Continuing from #1043
I would like to help out and make a template for Vite builds using the Babel/PostCSS method, but I still keep hitting a wall. When trying to create a Vite app that needs to run the compiler on some packages in node modules (much like the old open-props examples) I will get the
Unexpected 'stylex.defineVars' call at runtime. Styles must be compiled by '@stylexjs/babel-plugin'.
error.Does anyone have a working Vite example, that uses the PostCSS method, and also compiles a library like open-props?
I can achieve this with HoursGoul's plugin: https://github.com/HorusGoul/vite-plugin-stylex
But looking at the plugin, I cannot tell what is happening in there that allows this to work and yet not work in the PostCSS configuration.
I hope it is not too presumptuous for me to try an pull some smart people into this thread, but I'll ask your forgiveness ahead of time!
@sergiocarneiro to continue our conversation from the other thread.
@zaydek because I see you very active in HorusGoul's repo.
@HorusGoul the man himself.
Thanks all.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions