Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Heya, well in myst-parser it literally just pipes this directly through to docutils/sphinx: https://github.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/blob/7692f87610976a61af522aef663576f11f600237/myst_parser/mdit_to_docutils/base.py#L1488 so there its handled exactly the same |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello I have two questions:
First one with respect to mystRole in the form
{name}`text`
. Sphinx/(docutils?) seem to distinguish domain/role with the:
. myst goes simply with name. I'm guessing this is on purpose and I don't believe you have any reasons to track domain and role separately ? I haven't been able to find a case in rst-to-myst where there is a directive with explicit domain and role.I guess if I'm generating mystRole from my own rst parsing that have an explicit domain, I can just use
domain+':'+role
and the mystRole name ?{ref}`...`
was missing and could have added one.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions