Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Yes. It definitely should. And now that I have scripts to perform minor version bumps, I will add this in the next minor version, since it does impact signatures. Good call! :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
(I think this feels more like a discussion/question than an actual issue, so I've placed it here 😬 )
Right now the type definition is
export type BigNumberish = BigNumber | Bytes | string | number;
, but it seems BigInt's are supported anywhere BigNumber is supported, so perhaps this should beexport type BigNumberish = BigNumber | Bytes | string | number | bigint;
Currently trying to pass a BigInt when BigNumberish is expected gives
Argument of type 'bigint' is not assignable to parameter of type 'BigNumberish'. ts(2345)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions