Does it stuck if send a nonce gaped set-code-tx that has the same auth&from?

[rekyyang]

if a gap-nonce-tx with same from&auth arrived first time, checkDelegationLimit would return at line-618, because this tx has gaped nonce, it couldn't be executed.

And if I want to replace it, checkDelegationLimit would return ErrOutOfOrderTxFromDelegated because it has no pending

And if I want to fix the gap, because the from & the auth has the same address, checkDelegationLimit would return ErrInflightTxLimitReached?

[rjl493456442]

Sorry I don't quite understand your question.

If the sender has delegation or pending authorization, the nonce-gapped tx will be rejected in the first place. Why do you want to replace it?

[rekyyang]

sorry, I misunderstand the code... I'll close this ticket

[rekyyang]

sorry, I test this case and there are some questions I want to ask 🙏

My test case is (disable local tx):

1. prepare a account A without auth, nonce is 0
2. send a tx from A, and auth a contract to A, tx nonce is 3, auth nonce is 4 （this tx will be queued）
3. I can only send nonce 0 1 2 tx to fill the gap ONE BY ONE, but I cannot replace the first nonce 3 gapped auth tx directly
   Is it expected? If I send a gaped auth tx with a large gap, I have to wait the tx expire or fill the gap one by one(by the way, I mean I cannot send a bunch of txs to fill the gap one time)