Decentralization leads to neutrality

Make vision clearer: neutrality is a clearer benefit of decentralization than data privacy.

Author: ethosdev

src/intl/en/page-upgrades-vision.json

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
   "page-upgrades-vision-trilemma-cardtext-4": "Increasing the size and power of Ethereum's nodes could increase transactions per second in a secure way, but the hardware requirement would restrict who could do it - this threatens decentralization. It's hoped that sharding and proof-of-stake will allow Ethereum to scale by increasing the amount of nodes, not node size.",
   "page-upgrades-vision-trilemma-h2": "The challenge of decentralized scaling",
   "page-upgrades-vision-trilemma-modal-tip": "Tap the circles below to better understand the problems of decentralized scaling",
-  "page-upgrades-vision-trilemma-p": "A naive way to solve Ethereum's problems would be to make it more centralized. But decentralization is too important. It's decentralization that gives Ethereum censorship resistance, openness, data privacy and near-unbreakable security.",
+  "page-upgrades-vision-trilemma-p": "A naive way to solve Ethereum's problems would be to make it more centralized. But decentralization is too important. It's decentralization that gives Ethereum neutrality, censorship resistance, openness, and near-unbreakable security.",
   "page-upgrades-vision-trilemma-p-1": "Ethereum's vision is to be more scalable and secure, but also to remain decentralized. Achieving these 3 qualities is a problem known as the scalability trilemma.",
   "page-upgrades-vision-trilemma-p-2": "Ethereum upgrades aim to solve the trilemma but there are significant challenges.",
   "page-upgrades-vision-trilemma-press-button": "Press the buttons on the triangle to better understand the problems of decentralized scaling.",