fix typo

Author: hursittarcan

src/content/energy-consumption/index.md

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ From the very beginning, Ethereum planned to implement a proof-of-stake based co
 
 ![Energy consumption comparison of pre- and post-Merge Ethereum. Displayed is on the left the Eiffel tower with 330 meters height and on the right a plastic toy figure with 4 cm height within a magnifying glass.](energy_consumption_pre_post_merge.png)
 
-CCRI examined the impact of Ethereum’s transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake. The annualized electricity consumption was reduced by more than **99.988 %**. Likewise, Ethereum’s carbon footprint was decreased by approximately **99.992 %** (from 11,016,000 to 870 tonnes CO2e). Depicted metaphorically, this corresponds to a reduction in emissions from the height of the Eiffel Tower to a small plastic toy figure, as shown in the figure above. Therefore, the environmental cost of securing the network is drastically reduced. Simultaneously, the security of the network is thought to have increased.
+CCRI examined the impact of Ethereum’s transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake. The annualized electricity consumption was reduced by more than **99.988%**. Likewise, Ethereum’s carbon footprint was decreased by approximately **99.992%** (from 11,016,000 to 870 tonnes CO2e). Depicted metaphorically, this corresponds to a reduction in emissions from the height of the Eiffel Tower to a small plastic toy figure, as shown in the figure above. Therefore, the environmental cost of securing the network is drastically reduced. Simultaneously, the security of the network is thought to have increased.
 
 ## A green application layer {#green-applications}