Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
@pedrominatel when I originally was drafting this discussion I had a good half hour's worth of comments that github lost when I realized I hadn't selected a category yet and selected one. (Now a known discussions bug) Is it too late for me to capture those notes/comments here? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hi @0Grit, I've used this proposal as a starting point for the proposal at Pin Layout. Feel free to let your comments there, or prepare a PR. Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
See #3 for initial context of this discussion
The Feather pin spec leaves a lot to be desired for professional use cases. (As expected) But it seems to be used often so lets see if we can improve upon it in a backwards compatible way.
Feather Spec is here: https://learn.adafruit.com/adafruit-feather/feather-specification
The spec does not do much to constrain potential interpretations. I will leave comments for my own interpretations in order to enable them to be discussed individually.
Below I have created a table that shows the pinout and have summarily described the pin functions. I'd like the outcome of the discussion to be
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions