You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In user.pdf , it is mentioned that ''If drifts are speci ed with the Maxwell-Juttner distribution then the distribution is calculated in the
rest frame and then Lorentz transformed to the speci ed drifting frame.'', and this is for particles.
If I'm considering a intensity at a fully relativistic condition, is it necessary to write the laser field in its Lorentz transform, as one mentions as "the fields have to depend on (t - z/c) for a plane-wave pulse propagating in the z direction".
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
In user.pdf , it is mentioned that ''If drifts are speci ed with the Maxwell-Juttner distribution then the distribution is calculated in the
rest frame and then Lorentz transformed to the speci ed drifting frame.'', and this is for particles.
If I'm considering a intensity at a fully relativistic condition, is it necessary to write the laser field in its Lorentz transform, as one mentions as "the fields have to depend on (t - z/c) for a plane-wave pulse propagating in the z direction".
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions