Parser: mixing OprApp with OperatorBlockApplication gives unexpected result

[farmaazon]

The + operator is left-associative what one could expect:

2 + 3 + 4
(BodyBlock #((OprApp (OprApp (Number () "2" ()) (Ok "+") (Number () "3" ())) (Ok "+") (Number () "4" ())) ()))

I can also write it in several lines, making OperatorBlockApplication AST node

2
 + 3
 + 4
(BodyBlock #((OperatorBlockApplication (Number () "2" ()) #(((Ok "+") (Number () "3" ())) ((Ok "+") (Number () "4" ()))) #()) ()))

But when I mix the above, AST suddenly wants to evaluate 3 + 4 first

2 + 3
 + 4
(BodyBlock #((OprApp (Number () "2" ()) (Ok "+") (OperatorBlockApplication (Number () "3" ()) #(((Ok "+") (Number () "4" ()))) #())) ()))

Strangely, . operator works differently and more intuitively IMO

foo . bar
 . baz
(BodyBlock #((OperatorBlockApplication (OprApp (Ident foo) (Ok ".") (Ident bar)) #(((Ok ".") (Ident baz))) #()) ()))

@kazcw is this by design?

[kazcw]

This looks like a precedence bug. OperatorBlockApplication needs to bind more loosely than probably all operators except =.