Skip to content

Potential out-of-bounds read in _ux_host_class_audio_streaming_sampling_get()

Low
mrybczyn published GHSA-r6h5-fmhc-v3j7 Oct 17, 2025

Package

USBX (Eclipse ThreadX)

Affected versions

<= 6.4.2

Patched versions

6.4.3

Description

The function _ux_host_class_audio_streaming_sampling_get() parses a USB audio streaming interface descriptor to extract supported audio sampling characteristics. It iterates through descriptors in the configuration buffer and attempts to read specific frequency values when bSamFreqType is non-zero.

When bSamFreqType is non-zero, the descriptor includes an array of bSamFreqType 3-byte values starting at a fixed offset. However, the function does not validate that the buffer contains at least 3 × bSamFreqType bytes before performing the read. This leads to a possible out-of-bounds read if the descriptor is malformed or shorter than claimed.

A malicious USB device could exploit this by setting a large bSamFreqType value while providing an insufficient descriptor length, causing the host to read beyond valid memory. This could lead to crashes or memory disclosure.

code:

UINT  _ux_host_class_audio_streaming_sampling_get(UX_HOST_CLASS_AUDIO *audio, UX_HOST_CLASS_AUDIO_SAMPLING_CHARACTERISTICS *audio_sampling)

{

...

    descriptor =               audio -> ux_host_class_audio_configuration_descriptor;

    total_descriptor_length =  audio -> ux_host_class_audio_configuration_descriptor_length;

...

    while (total_descriptor_length)

    {

 

        /* Gather the length, type and subtype of the descriptor.  */

        descriptor_length =   *descriptor;

        descriptor_type =     *(descriptor + 1);

        descriptor_subtype =  *(descriptor + 2);

...

        switch(descriptor_type)

        {

...

        case UX_HOST_CLASS_AUDIO_CS_INTERFACE:

...

                if ((audio_sampling -> ux_host_class_audio_sampling_characteristics_channels == 0) &&

                    (audio_sampling -> ux_host_class_audio_sampling_characteristics_resolution == 0))

                {

...

                else

                {

 

                    /* This is not the second time we ask for the characteristics, we need

                       to find 1st where we left off and look at the next characteristics.  */

                    if ((audio_sampling -> ux_host_class_audio_sampling_characteristics_channels == audio_interface_descriptor.bNrChannels) &&

                        (audio_sampling -> ux_host_class_audio_sampling_characteristics_resolution == audio_interface_descriptor.bBitResolution))

                    {

...

                        if (audio_interface_descriptor.bSamFreqType == 0)

                        {

...

                        }

                        else

                        {

 

                            /* The declaration of the frequency is declared as an array of specific values.  */

                            for (specific_frequency_count = 0; specific_frequency_count < audio_interface_descriptor.bSamFreqType; specific_frequency_count++) <-- this for look can go out of bound

                            {

 

                                lower_frequency =  (ULONG) *(descriptor + UX_HOST_CLASS_AUDIO_INTERFACE_DESCRIPTOR_LENGTH + (specific_frequency_count * 3)) |

                                                   ((ULONG) *(descriptor + UX_HOST_CLASS_AUDIO_INTERFACE_DESCRIPTOR_LENGTH + 1 + (specific_frequency_count * 3))) << 8 |

                                                   ((ULONG) *(descriptor + UX_HOST_CLASS_AUDIO_INTERFACE_DESCRIPTOR_LENGTH + 2 + (specific_frequency_count * 3))) << 16;

...

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Physical
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability Low
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVE ID

CVE-2025-55097

Weaknesses

Out-of-bounds Read

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. Learn more on MITRE.