Skip to content

Commit 9d6abb8

Browse files
authored
docs: fix typos (#1924) (#1925)
1 parent e09bf04 commit 9d6abb8

File tree

5 files changed

+5
-5
lines changed

5 files changed

+5
-5
lines changed

docs/pages/container.rst

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ List of supported containers:
1616
- :class:`RequiresContext <returns.context.requires_context.RequiresContext>`
1717
to pass context to your functions (DI and similar)
1818

19-
There are also some combintations like
19+
There are also some combinations like
2020
:class:`IOResult <returns.io.IOResult>`,
2121
:class:`FutureResult <returns.future.FutureResult>`,
2222
:class:`RequiresContextResult <.RequiresContextResult>`,

docs/pages/contrib/hypothesis_plugins.rst

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ check_all_laws
7272
--------------
7373

7474
We also provide a very powerful mechanism of checking defined container laws.
75-
It works in a combitation with "Laws as Values" feature we provide in the core.
75+
It works in a combination with "Laws as Values" feature we provide in the core.
7676

7777
.. code:: python
7878

docs/pages/do-notation.rst

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Async containers
8888
We also support async containers like ``Future`` and ``FutureResult``.
8989
It works in a similar way as regular sync containers.
9090
But, they require ``async for`` expressions instead of regular ``for`` ones.
91-
And because of that - they cannot be used outsided of ``async def`` context.
91+
And because of that - they cannot be used outside of ``async def`` context.
9292

9393
Usage example:
9494

docs/pages/interfaces.rst

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ The last criteria we have to decided on naming is
7676
That's why we have ``ResultLikeN`` and ``ResultBasedN`` interfaces.
7777
Because ``ResultBasedN`` has two extra methods compared to ``ResultLikeN``.
7878
We use ``Like`` suffix for interfaces that describes some similar types.
79-
We use ``Based`` suffix for interfaces that descire almost concrete types.
79+
We use ``Based`` suffix for interfaces that describe almost concrete types.
8080

8181
Laws
8282
~~~~

docs/pages/result.rst

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ You might want to sometimes use ``unify`` :ref:`pointfree` functions
174174
instead of ``.bind`` to compose error types together.
175175
While ``.bind`` enforces error type to stay the same,
176176
``unify`` is designed
177-
to return a ``Union`` of a revious error type and a new one.
177+
to return a ``Union`` of a previous error type and a new one.
178178

179179
It gives an extra flexibility, but also provokes more thinking
180180
and can be problematic in some cases.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)