[Question]Current Status of .ConfigureAwait(false)?

[tzengshinfu]

Hi, folks:

Currently, our team is using .NET Framework 4.8.
We have two C# libraries, one for accessing the databases and the other for interacting with the PLCs.
The server-side console project references these two libraries,
while the client-side Windows Forms project communicates with the server via Web API.

I’ve been away from C# for a while (was in the Java ecosystem, recently reassigned back to C#).
From what I remember, it was recommended to use .ConfigureAwait(false) in common libraries, right?

However, after being away for so long, seeing a bunch of .ConfigureAwait(false) calls still feels visually distracting:

if (await _plc.GetY2SendCarrierPlateSizeAsync().ConfigureAwait(false) == Y2.Plc.SendCarrierPlateSizeEnum.None)
{
    return this;
}

await _plc.SetWcsReceiveCarrierPlateSizeAsync(await _plc.GetY2SendCarrierPlateSizeAsync().ConfigureAwait(false)).ConfigureAwait(false);

if (await _plc.GetY2SendCarrierPlateAsync().ConfigureAwait(false) != Y2.Plc.SendCarrierPlateEnum.Triggered)
{
    return this;
}

_ctx.CoreNo = await _plc.GetY2CarrierPlateNoAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);

await _plc.SetWcsCarrierPlateNoAsync(_ctx.CoreNo).ConfigureAwait(false);

await _plc.SetWcsReceiveCarrierPlateAsync(ReceiveCarrierPlateEnum.Received).ConfigureAwait(false);

_ctx.OrderNo = _ctx.OrderNo + 1;
await _ctx.Save().ConfigureAwait(false);

(Also, asynchronous method names are usually in the form of Get/SetXXXAsync, which is clear—but sometimes really too verbose.)

Has this situation improved nowadays?

[huoyaoyuan]

#8955

There was no update recently. I'm also supporting this.