Skip to content

MSDK 5.14.0 - getLTEEnhancedTransmissionType error on DJI Mini 4 Pro #546

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
chano1025 opened this issue Apr 16, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@chano1025
Copy link

Hello.

Calling getLTEEnhancedTransmissionType of the LTEManager class results in an error.

Image

Thank you.

@dji-dev
Copy link
Contributor

dji-dev commented Apr 16, 2025

Agent comment from YIGUI LIU in Zendesk ticket #140038:

Dear Developer,

Is the Enhanced Transmission feature working properly for you in the DJI Fly APP?

It is necessary to ensure that the RC - N2 remote controller is connected to the network properly, and that the DJI Cellular Dongle 2 is successfully installed on the aircraft and the SIM card is activated.

Best Regards,
DJI Innovations SDK Technical Support Team

°°°

@chano1025
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your answer.

For M3T, when calling getLTEEnhancedTransmissionType() without DJI Cellular Dongle connected, it returned LTELinkType as OCU_SYNC in onSuccess callback.

However, Dji mini 4 pro does not return OCU_SYNC or UNKNOWN in onSuccess callback, but returns onFailure.

Thank you.

@dji-dev
Copy link
Contributor

dji-dev commented Apr 16, 2025

Agent comment from YIGUI LIU in Zendesk ticket #140038:

Dear Developer,

I reproduced the situation you mentioned on the Mini 4 Pro and M3T models using the sample app of MSDK v5.14.0.

Then, I confirmed with the MSDK R & D team that the MSDK does not support the LTE function of the Mini 4 Pro, and there are currently no plans for relevant support.

Thank you for your understanding and support.

Best Regards,
DJI Innovations SDK Technical Support Team

°°°

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants