-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
RomSe
Analyzing the uses of the reflexive clitic SE in Romance.
For the (morpho-)syntactic realization of SE, see RomClitics. This page addresses problems at the syntax/semantics interface.
-
The term SE encompasses 5 surface forms (1st or 2nd x sing or plur + 3rd sing/plur).
-
same form for accusative and dative (sometimes impossible to resolve)
- SE (in all uses) is incompatible with the verb avoir (temporal auxiliary or main verb 'have').
Ex. Je lui ai dit, il m'a dit but Je me suis dit, il s'est dit
- Only accusative SE triggers past participle agreement.
Ex. Elles se sont rencontrées but Elles se sont parlé
i.e., reflexive/reciprocal SE
common properties
- realization of an accusative or dative complement
- receives the semantic role associated with that complement
- alternates with non-reflexive accusative or dative clitics/NPs/PPs
- alternates with strong reflexive pronouns
se laver (acc), se parler (dat)
examples and language specific properties, implemented or planned analysis
aka "inherent SE"
common properties
- lexically specified but assigned no semantic role (expletive)
- accusative (rarely dative?)
- does not alternate with non-reflexive complements (or change in word sense)
- does not alternate/co-occur with strong reflexive pronoun
se taire, se rire
common properties
-
passive-like demotion of active subject and promotion of accusative complement
-
impossibility of agentive by-phrase
se vendre
Home | Forum | Discussions | Events