-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Climb_GClimb_German
This page provides background information on phenomena and implementations included in gCLIMB for German.
In this document, I and me refers to AntskeFokkens.
Disclaimer
-
This documentation is under construction and incomplete. At present, the only way to get detailed into implementations of gCLIMB is by looking at the grammars.
-
I am currently finishing my thesis. In the near future, this page will therefore mostly contain background information that completes work described in my PhD. If you have request on other explanations or documentation, please contact me and I'll see if I can shift priorities around.
-
This documentation will be restructured soon
For now, e-mail me. The repository should be accessible for guest accounts soon.
This section provides an incomplete list of phenomena implemented in gCLIMB for German. It describes when the phenomenon was added, when revised and what decisions were made concerning the scope of the phenomenon (i.e. what to do rare constructions, examples that are awkward, but not ungrammatical etc.)
Split verbal clusters are a specific form of partial VP fronting, where the main verb is placed in the Vorfeld (optionally accompanied by one or more arguments) and at least one auxiliary is left in the Right Bracket. An example (meaning you should be able to sleep here):
Topological fields: | Vorfeld | Left Bracket | Mittelfeld | Right Bracket | Nachfeld |
German: | Schlafen | solltest | Du hier auf jeden Fall | können | |
Transliteration: | sleep.inf | should.2nd.sg | you.nom here in any case | can.inf |
Split verbal clusters are beyond doubt grammatical, but marked and rarely used. gCLIMB allows you to either include or exclude them. These two possibilities have been present in gCLIMB since Fokkens (2011), though revisions have been made.
Old Bug report
At certain stages in the past, the argument-composition analysis in gCLIMB required the fronted main verb to fit subcategorization requirements of the finite verb in the left bracket. This is incorrect, it should fit subcategorization requirements of the auxiliary in the Nachfeld that governs it. The repository table provides the information that is currently available about this bug. Where it was introduced exactly and when it was fixed is still under investigation.
repository version | addition/revision |
Older branch | Split cluster already optionally included. The aux-rule analysis uses a hack that violates principles of semantic compositionality |
19578 | Bug on subcategorization requirements identified |
... | ... |
23282 | Bug known to be fixed, more principled analysis for aux-rule and split clusters (Fokkens, in progress) |
-
repository version addition/revision 19613 Initial implementation of nicht with free position of adverbial
Comments:
- Fronting of the negative adverb in German sounds unnatural, but could be acceptable in poetry. In the initial implementation it is accepted by the grammar (i.e. parsed and generated)
?Nicht schläft der Mann.
Not sleep.pres.3rd.sg the.nom man.nom.
''The Man doesn't sleep.''
== References ==
Fokkens, Antske (2011) Metagrammar engineering: Towards systematic ex- ploration of implemented grammars. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan- guage Technologies, pages 1066–1076, Portland, Oregon, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.<BR>
Fokkens, Antske (in progress) Enhancing empirical research for linguistic precision grammars. PhD thesis. Saarland University.<BR> NB References to this work in the documentation are already written. Please contact me if you are interested in this information before the PhD is done.
Home | Forum | Discussions | Events