Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi, @JGHan7, the setting of the same constant by different software may differ in significant digits. This should not be a problem,and the results given by any software are valid under specific accuracy. For the problem you mentioned, you can do a test to check the effect of the inconsistent of "LATTICE_CONSTANT". Do two calculations with same LATTICE_VECTORS and ATOMIC_POSITIONS, and different "LATTICE_CONSTANT" defined in ABACUS and dpdata, and then check the final energies. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
For some calculations that require a more accurate structure, it is very convenient to convert POSCAR files to STRU files through dpdata.
And we can convert the default unit of atomic positions from Cartesian to Cartesian_angstrom, so that when LATTICE_CONSTANT is modified (for example, when a supercell is needed), it will not affect the atomic positions. However, dpdata and ABACUS are inconsistent in the unit conversion between angstroms and Bohrs, which causes a certain error in this modification.
Can this problem be improved? Thank you
By the way, one of the common results I searched on the Internet is 1A = 1.889725988579 Bohr, which is not completely consistent with dpdata and ABACUS, which is very strange...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions