Weekly Progress of DeePMD-kit 20220905 #1894
HuangJiameng
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What's new
Issue
Discussion
Answered
big error in tensile stress computation using dp #1872
Problem: Lammps simulations run well for a small model of 10675 atoms, while report errors and terminate when the simulation model becomes bigger of 33856 atoms.
Answer: It was discussed in #1062. It is a bug in CUDA Toolkit 11.1~11.3.
There is an obvious difference to calcaulate thermal conductivity with different deepmd version #1882
Problem: Why there is a big difference in the calculation of heat flux results between 2.0.0.b3 and later version.
Answer: The issue in the calculation of heat flux is fixed since v2.0.1, please see #1093 and #1451
RDF calculation #1861
Problem: How to create DFT from deepmd-kit interatom potential
Answer: We can create RDF directly using deepmd binary data using following code.-- Link - https://github.com/deepmodeling/dpdata/blob/master/dpdata/md/rdf.py
Can deepmd-kit help me normalize the label values? #1889
Problem: Can deepmd-kit help me normalize the label values?
Answer: No, you have to do it manually.
On going
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions