Incorrect Significance Level Indicators

[biancanolann]

Good Morning Dazhwu,
I have been using your package for my master thesis, it has been invaluable thank you so much for the hard work!
I have noticed however that the significance levels indicated in the results table could possibly be incorrect.
Are the * indications meant to follow the traditional indication of * 90%, ** = 95%, *** = 99% significance confidence levels?
If so, I think there may be some that are incorrect, as I am seeing reported, for example, p-values as low as 0.0037 as ( * * ). As far as I understand, p-values > 0.05 (as is the case for 0.003) should be labeled as significant at the 99% confidence level ( * * * ). Is my understanding correct? Please let me know if this is not the case.
Many thanks!
Bianca

Sharing an illustration of the error: