You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Lakehouse Monitoring should be your first choice if you need post-factum data quality monitoring (once data is written to a table). Use DQX if you need pro-active monitoring (before data is written to a target table).
DQX can prevent corrupted data from reaching your cleaned/silver table, while Lakehouse Monitoring only detects them after they are already in the table. This is also one of the reasons why we built DQX.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Lakehouse Monitoring should be your first choice if you need post-factum data quality monitoring (once data is written to a table). Use DQX if you need pro-active monitoring (before data is written to a target table).
DQX can prevent corrupted data from reaching your cleaned/silver table, while Lakehouse Monitoring only detects them after they are already in the table. This is also one of the reasons why we built DQX.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions