Replies: 1 comment
-
Maybe we should temporarily keep back the arm64 image base? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Background
Databend used to say that we support running on Linux & macOS both on amd64 & arm64 platforms. But we didn't say we which versions we support.
For example,
This problem becomes more serious for the Linux platform, as described in those issues:
So, we need to define a clear policy for databend platform support. With this policy, our users will know which platform is native, and which platform needs extra work or cost.
It's a contract between developers and users.
Proposal
So I propose a draft for our first version of platform support.
databend-query
,databend-meta
,databend-benchmark
andbendctl
.Welcome any comments!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions