Dagster types and typing.NewType #31445
Unanswered
futurewasfree
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Let's say I have definition like this that maps back to primitive type:
and I'm trying to use such
UserId
inConfigurableResource
and getting the following error:I'm wondering if it would be possible to support such indirect primitive types there?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions