Replies: 1 comment
-
I find out that partitions are explicitly sorted by a reason in here
It's quite a big issue, coz a partions order and their names have matter to organize data hierarchy as needed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Today, if I have a multi partitioned asset, the folder levels in storage reflect the alphabetical ordering of the partition names. I would like to suggest it to reflect the ordering that is passed to the MultiPartitionsDefinition.
Example:
will create the following directory structure in $dagster_home/storage:
2023-04-01/tic1
2023-04-01/tic2
2023-05-01/tic1
2023-05-01/tic2
If I rename the "run_day" partitions definition to "today"
the order changes to
tic1/2023-04-01
tic1/2023-05-01
tic2/2023-04-01
tic2/2023-05-01
But it is weird to play with names (and find meaningful ones) just to keep an ordering of files that makes more sense (for other systems, for example).
I would like to suggest that the order of
partitions_defs
is respected. So:would have
ticker
as first level, whilewould have
run_day
as first level.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions