Update "Documentation" section of README.MD #467
pawelWritesCode
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi, this is interesting and seems useful, however somewhat similar proposal was previously rejected here #410 and the rationale still applies. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I'm working with godog for some time and I came up with idea of writting skeleton repo that sets basic godog structures and develop it for HTTP API testing purposes.
Result of my work is here: https://github.com/pawelWritesCode/godog-http-api
My goal is to make user's life easier. That's why I emphasize ease of setup, properly documenting code and provide maintanable architecture. When I switched from PHP(behat) to GO(godog) I struggled with finding good library with gherkin steps for testing HTTP API. Now, I would like to contribute to community and share my work so others may benefit from my experience - I hope this setup may be good guide for anyone who wants to start using godog and struggle with finding medium size egzample. That's why I need you, to tell me whether you find this repository useful and is worth to mention in README.MD? I would be glad to hear any feedback from you.
Mostly, I would like to know whether you find it properly developed in terms of godog primitives/standards and Do I have green light to create pull request to README.MD with link to this repo?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions