Multisig Setup - Security Tradeoffs With Pruned Bitcoin Core Node? #1144
adam-hurwitz
started this conversation in
Security Best Practices
Replies: 1 comment
-
1. How is the pruned node run for Specter? Is it running off of Bitcoin Core directly?
2. Is the privacy risk mitigated by connecting Bitcoin Core's pruned node through Tor/VPN (That do not save/collect logs)?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What are the security tradeoffs of running a pruned Bitcoin Core node for a multisig wallet, such as Specter?
It seems that using a multisig wallet with a pruned Bitcoin Core node could be a good incremental improvement of securing assets vs. storing funds on an exchange or on a single seed hardware wallet.
How is the pruned node run for Specter? Is it running off of Bitcoin Core directly?
I've heard that similar services, Unchained Capital, run a node supported by Blockstream if I understand correctly.
Is the privacy risk mitigated by connecting Bitcoin Core's pruned node through Tor/VPN (That do not save/collect logs)?
Chain analysis companies are able to gather information from non-self-hosted nodes and tie it to personal information.
Are there additional tradeoffs to consider?
The Specter GitHub FAQ "Can I use pruned node?" mentions privacy implications and does not provide further info.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions