[dcl.array], [temp.deduct.type] Split notes spanning numbered paragraphs. (#1261)

Partially addresses #781.

Author: jensmaurer

source/declarators.tex

@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@
 in such a way that
 \tcode{E1[E2]}
 is identical to
-\tcode{*((E1)+(E2))}.
+\tcode{*((E1)+(E2))}~(\ref{expr.sub}).
 Because of the conversion rules
 that apply to
 \tcode{+},
@@ -1156,8 +1156,10 @@
 Therefore,
 despite its asymmetric
 appearance, subscripting is a commutative operation.
+\end{note}
 
 \pnum
+\begin{note}
 A consistent rule is followed for
 \indextext{array!multidimensional}%
 multidimensional arrays.
@@ -1183,8 +1185,6 @@
 is applied to this pointer,
 the result is the pointed-to $(n-1)$-dimensional array,
 which itself is immediately converted into a pointer.
-
-\pnum
 \begin{example}
 consider
 

source/templates.tex

@@ -7284,8 +7284,10 @@
   f3(v);            // OK: \tcode{i} deduced to be \tcode{10}
 }
 \end{codeblock}
+\end{note}
 
 \pnum
+\begin{note}
 If, in the declaration of a function template with a non-type
 template parameter, the non-type template parameter
 is used in a subexpression in the function parameter list,
@@ -7305,6 +7307,8 @@
 \end{codeblock}
 \end{example}
 \end{note}
+
+\pnum
 \begin{note}
 Template parameters do not participate in template argument deduction if
 they are used only in non-deduced contexts.