Skip to content

test with Classic ActiveMQ #87

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
amircogan opened this issue Nov 2, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #91
Closed

test with Classic ActiveMQ #87

amircogan opened this issue Nov 2, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #91

Comments

@amircogan
Copy link

Hi,

This seems like the best asyncio implementation of STOMP. Thanks!!.
The readme says it was tested with Artemis ActiveMQ. I was wondering if there is any experience with Classic ActiveMQ testing as we probably need to use that one.

Thanks!!
@vrslev
Copy link
Collaborator

vrslev commented Nov 2, 2024

Hi! Thanks for your kind words ☺️

Does Classic ActiveMQ has a Docker image I can use in integration tests?

@amircogan
Copy link
Author

Hi,

Yes, please see at:
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq-classic/tags

Thanks!!

@vrslev
Copy link
Collaborator

vrslev commented Nov 3, 2024

Ok, I'll look into it later, thanks!

@vrslev vrslev mentioned this issue Nov 5, 2024
Merged
@vrslev vrslev closed this as completed in #91 Nov 5, 2024
@vrslev
Copy link
Collaborator

vrslev commented Nov 5, 2024

Hi! Now stompman is tested both on ActiveMQ Artemis and ActiveMQ Classic. There were one thing that needed to be fixed: #92—it is already in 1.6.0.

@amircogan
Copy link
Author

Great, many thanks, will try it soon

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Claim ActiveMQ Classic support community-of-python/stompman
2 participants
@amircogan @vrslev