Replies: 1 comment
-
Yeah, that moment when the answer lands — and something feels off, or just incomplete — and you want to chase the trace back. Most RAG systems do the “source link” thing as a UI patch. But maybe the real need isn’t navigation, it’s semantic confirmation. Like: “does this sentence really live in that paragraph, or was it reborn out of thin embedding?” We had cases where even opening the original doc didn’t help — because the answer was stitched from fragments never actually adjacent. Looked fine, read weird. Not saying source jumping is wrong — just wondering if RAG UX should include a notion of semantic proximity, not just file refs. Curious if anyone’s tried mapping that before. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
it would be nice to be able to go to the source documents when using rag chat.
when I get an answer and source documents, sometimes it would be useful to be able to open the document and check the source
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions