Starting to import background information into the documentation.

A lot of this is based on the initial stuff documented in the Google Doc
at https://interchange.vtr.tools

Signed-off-by: Tim 'mithro' Ansell <tansell@google.com>

Author: Tim 'mithro' Ansell

docs/common.md

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+# Common
+
+## Important Key Ideas
+
+### Versioning
+
+
+
+### Data, Representation and Encoding independence
+
+Everything in the interchange format should have a clear distinction between;
+
+ * (a) the "data as a concepts",
+ * (b) the "data as represented" and
+ * (c) the "data as encoded in a file format".
+
+For example,
+
+ * (a) the data being represented could be "the name of an object",
+ * (b) but it could be represented as an integer pointing to a UTF-8 string
+   table, and
+ * (c) that could be encoded as either XML or Cap'n'Proto file format.
+
+### On disk representation
+
+The interchange format should define both;
+
+ * (a) A compact binary machine readable format, **and**
+ * (b) a texted based human readable format.
+
+Tools should exist which do lossless conversion between the machine and human
+readable formats.
+
+The preferred on disk formats for the interchange format are;
+
+ * (a) Binary Machine readable format - **Cap'n'Proto**
+ * (b) Text based human readable format - **XML**
+
+These two formats where selected because, they have;
+
+ * A well defined schema format.
+ * Good support by almost all languages, including the important languages of
+   C++, Python and Java.
+ * Already in use by core target tools.
+
+While **XML** is the preferred text based format, to enable wider adoption of
+the interchange format, **optional** support for *alternative* human readable
+text formats is encouraged.
+
+High value targets formats include;
+
+ * JSON
+ * YAML
+
+
+#### Schemas
+
+To make sure that files comply with the interchange specification, schemas for
+the on-disk file formats which allow at least some automatic validation should
+be provided.
+
+#### Backwards Compatibility
+
+Schema for the file formats should be extended to maintain backwards
+compatibility will previous on-disk formats.
+
+Making breaking changes in on-disk formats require a new major version of the
+specification to be published.
+
+
+#### Common Metadata
+
+All files should have a set of common metadata to make it easy to connect files
+together and understand their relationship.
+
+As the file output should be deterministic, files **should** include the
+details required to reproduce the file output easily.
+
+This includes;
+
+  * Checksum of inputs
+  * Information (version, command line arguments, random seed, etc) around
+    tooling used to create the file.
+
+Should **not** include;
+
+ * Anything which makes builds not-reproducible.
+   See https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/ for common examples.
+
+
+#### String Storage
+
+ * A significant percentage of the data in all the files are strings that are
+   only needed for humans.
+
+ * These strings are frequently used for identifiers.
+
+ * For this reason special care has been taken around both the representation
+   and the on-disk encoding of these strings.
+
+
+

docs/index.rst

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Welcome to FPGA Interchange documentation!
    :maxdepth: 2
    :caption: Contents:
 
+   common
    device_resources
    bel_and_site_design
    pseudo_cells