Order of dimensions for ensemble model output #423
-
As far as I can understand, CF-convention has no restrictions on the order of dimensions, but recommends using the order But is there a recommendation/requirement for the order of the additional ensemble/realization dimension for output from ensemble ocean or atmospheric models? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
Hello @knutfrode, I don't know of any such recommendation or requirement, but I personally would go for |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There is such a recommendation in the second paragraph of section 2.4. "All other dimensions should, whenever possible, be placed to the left of the spatiotemporal dimensions." This is in accordance with the COARDS recommendation for ordering of additional dimensions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think that settles it -- but might it be worth adding text specifically about ensembles? NOTE, as for:
With modern netcdf (e.g. HDF, zarr, ....) this would be controlled by how it's chunked -- anyone know of the top of their head what the netcdf default chunking would do in this case? Of course, with everything chunky -- what you should do depends how you want to access the data -- if you want results fro all of the ensemble members at one place over time, you wouldn't want it chunked in the default way ... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
There is such a recommendation in the second paragraph of section 2.4. "All other dimensions should, whenever possible, be placed to the left of the spatiotemporal dimensions." This is in accordance with the COARDS recommendation for ordering of additional dimensions.