Skip to content

Ticker EVER #1978

@keynobase

Description

@keynobase

HI,

I has 2 pools at my ticker EVER. I only use one, the second is closed.

The STOPPED and old pool is this one : 47902d91eddfb1794ed075d1a54d764f6b2f70800bc3d83f7608388a110a6f10.
This pool has 0 ADAs as controlled stake. Pools margin 50%. 500 ADAs as cost per epoch.

The STARTED and new pood is this one : d7ad46b7628f6d6f86a3a439d3e5e3097e79e753cbce06061f28c3346f29648e
This pool has 64.000 ADAs as controlled stake. Pools margin 5%. 0 ADAs as cost per epoch.

Is obvious that the started pool has best conditions than the closesd. Rigth now my pool is started from 3 days, 13 Hours (uptime: 305952), and also this pool has created one block.

The problem is that Daedalus put the stopped pool before than the started. The rankig is this one :

Stopped, 47902d91eddfb1794ed075d1a54d764f6b2f70800bc3d83f7608388a110a6f10., rank 437
Started, d7ad46b7628f6d6f86a3a439d3e5e3097e79e753cbce06061f28c3346f29648e, rank 820

My question is why daelaus evaluate better my stopped pool if it has the worst parameters ?

Thanks,

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions