Skip to content

Calculation of variance in the super resolution loss #11

@SorourMo

Description

@SorourMo

Hi,

I have a question about variance in sr_loss. Could you please elaborate on why variance is calculated this way?

# Mean var of predicted distribution:

        var = K.sum(masked_probs * (1.0 - masked_probs), axis=(1, 2)) / (
            c_mask_size * c_mask_size
        )  # (16x5) / (16,1) --> shape 16x5`

Basically, in the above line, we calculate sigma(x(1-x)) / (n^2). However, since we had calculated mean (mu) in the previous line, we could use mu in the calculation of variance.

Definition of variance is sigma((x-mu)^2) / n. So I was thinking something like below:
mean = K.sum(masked_probs, axis=(1, 2)) / c_mask_size # (16x5) / (16,1) --> shape 16x5
var = K.sum((K.pow(masked_probs - mean, 2) * c_mask), axis=(1, 2)) / ( c_mask_size ) # (16x5) / (16,1) --> shape 16x5
In the above line, * c_mask sets to zero the irrelevant values outside the current class's mask.

So why not stick to the exact variance formula here? Am I missing something?

Thanks,

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions