You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30273: fuzz: FuzzedSock::Recv() don't lose bytes from MSG_PEEK read
4d81b4d fuzz: FuzzedSock::Recv() don't lose bytes from MSG_PEEK read (Vasil Dimov)
b51d75e fuzz: simplify FuzzedSock::m_peek_data (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Problem:
If `FuzzedSock::Recv(N, MSG_PEEK)` is called then `N` bytes would be
retrieved from the fuzz provider, saved in `m_peek_data` and returned
to the caller (ok).
If after this `FuzzedSock::Recv(M, 0)` is called where `M < N`
then the first `M` bytes from `m_peek_data` would be returned
to the caller (ok), but the remaining `N - M` bytes in `m_peek_data`
would be discarded/lost (not ok). They must be returned by a subsequent
`Recv()`.
To resolve this, only remove the head `N` bytes from `m_peek_data`.
---
This is a followup to bitcoin/bitcoin#30211, more specifically:
bitcoin/bitcoin#30211 (comment)bitcoin/bitcoin#30211 (comment)
ACKs for top commit:
marcofleon:
ACK 4d81b4d. Tested this with the I2P fuzz target and there's no loss in coverage. I think overall this is an improvement in the robustness of `Recv` in `FuzzedSock`.
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 4d81b4d
brunoerg:
utACK 4d81b4d
Tree-SHA512: 73b5cb396784652447874998850e45899e8cba49dcd2cc96b2d1f63be78e48201ab88a76cf1c3cb880abac57af07f2c65d673a1021ee1a577d0496c3a4b0c5dd
0 commit comments